The Craft of Writing, Part Five: Information

Hello, hello, hello, hello! I hope your Valentine’s Day went well. Whether with a romantic partner-in-crime or alone with God, I’ve recently heard a number of my wise friends say that what matters most is that you foster the prime relationships you have – both with God and your fellow man. I have to wholeheartedly agree.

Today we’re crossing into the second half of our series about the craft of writing. So far we’ve covered plot, character development, setting and pacing. Now, continuing on the notion of pacing is a factor to which it is intimately tied: the dissemination of information. What do I mean by this? By “dissemination of information,” I mean the revealing of mysteries, the answering of questions or the introduction of something new to the story. Essentially, it’s adding a bit of novelty.

Suppose, for example, you’re writing a story in which your protagonist unveils and ultimately foils a grand conspiracy. You can’t simply reveal the whole conspiracy in your first chapter, or else you’d have nothing left to reveal in the rest of the tale. But if you wait until the second-to-last chapter to reveal all that information, then with what have you filled up all of the previous chapters? What you need to do is space the information out, spreading it like butter over the toast of your novel. This is most preferable for two complementary reasons:

  1. By spacing out the information, you’re contributing to the proper pacing that you worked hard to establish according to last week’s post. If you go too long without revealing information, your story may soon grow boring. And if you give away everything at the start, then you have nothing left to reveal and the rest of your book (until the climax) will be similarly boring. What works best is establishing a steady rate of revelation: a little bit here, a little bit there, some more here, some new facts there. And eventually, these little bits of information will begin to form something new underlying your story, something rich and developed. Your readers will feel like detectives, better able to identify with your protagonist as they put the information together along with him (or her).
  2. But you also want to add breaks. If every chapter reveals truckloads of new information, then your reader can quickly become overwhelmed and lost in all of the novelty. My recommendation is similar to that of the pacing: after every high-speed place, after every information dump, take a break and allow the reader to catch their breath. Let them process the information for a bit before you throw something new into the mix. You don’t want to pull a Matrix Reloaded and wait until one of the last parts of the tale to unload everything, or it will be too much for the audience to take in at a time (I still have no idea what The Architect was saying in that scene). Let the audience take the information in little spurts, or at a slow and steady rate, but not too slow, or you’ll lose their interest.

Now you may, unfortunately, run into a pinched point where you have no choice but to reveal a large amount of information in a short amount of time. It’s understandable, it happens to me from time to time. If you have exhausted all other options and find yourself facing this conundrum, my advice is to try and be as careful and clever as possible. While writing Torjen II: The Search for Andross, I arrived at a chapter where I was forced to introduce over a dozen new characters who were to have an intense discussion. The best I could do in that scenario was to make each as unique as possible so that the reader could keep them separate, then focus predominantly on only a few of them. I had a similar issue in my most recent work, The Choice of Anonymity, in which the ultimate explanation was revealed in one chapter. To balance this, I added foreshadowing in order to set this up, and then I still held a few key bits of information on reserve so as to keep the reader engaged. The foreshadowing worked like a charm, allowing for the revealed information to read more like a linking of facts than a wholesale revelation of them.

So the basic rule of thumb is to tie in the revealing of new information with the pacing you’ve already constructed. That adds some consistency to your book, as well as depth. But as a final note, let me point out that in the end of your work, all of the most important information must be explained. That’s my personal pet peeve in writing, when mysteries are established and then left unsolved. I mean, sure, you don’t have to explain whether or not one character followed through on their resolution to quit smoking or if another character ultimately conquered her fear of flying. But the big, crucial information that forms the core plot of your work must be answered.

However, it doesn’t necessarily have to be answered in this book. Suppose you’re writing a trilogy, or a series, or a grouping of works that interrelate but don’t form a linear series. If, over the course of your stories or books (notice the plurality there), those things will eventually be answered, then you may withhold key pieces of information to be made clear later. Again returning to The Choice of Anonymity, I leave the ultimate fate of all but my protagonist unknown, but the reason for this is that there will be two follow-up novels in this trilogy, and their fates will be made known there.

So if you’re going to establish a mystery, or some unresolved question, please ignore the tendency of the highly-talented and fascinating writer/director J.J. Abrams, who chooses to leave his mysteries unresolved. Let it be known, my friends. Let it be known.

Until next time, friends…

Stay tuned for my next blog post, in which I’ll discuss the deeper relationship between the protagonist and antagonist!

5 Comments

Filed under For the Writers, Quest for Knowledge

5 responses to “The Craft of Writing, Part Five: Information

  1. jasonthefuzz

    Some stories are best left unresolved. Would the ending to Inception have been better if the top had either fallen or continued to spin? Would “The Lady or the Tiger” have been as famous if it had clearly explained which room the Princess’ suitor had opened?
    Alternatively, some stories explain too much. “The Mist” has a soldier sobbingly confess that scientists were trying to create a window to another universe. While that explains the purpose of the mist, that level of science fiction stands in stark contrast to the mysterious feel of the rest of the tale. “The Circle” tells the story of 50 people who wake up in a room. They are forced to vote for one person’s death or let themselves die by random chance. The characters discuss the purpose of the room at length and they come up with many possibilities. The ending clearly shows which theory was correct, but it would have made for a better tale if the ending was left up to fierce debate.

    • True, sometimes it is good to leave the ultimate explanation up to debate. But what I don’t like is a complete lack of any explanation, even hints, or far too many things left unresolved. I’m not a fan of movies or shows which leave five or six different plot threads without closure, or which leave the main characters completely passive and merely along for the ride. I suppose that’d be a point where it’s okay to leave an explanation unresolved, so long as you don’t leave the main characters in a precarious ending. The audience needs some closure, at least a little bit, in order for the story to feel complete.

      Also, props on mentioning “The Circle.” I didn’t know anyone else had seen that fascinating little film. Although in all honesty, that last survivor was a jerk, if I say so politely.

      • Thought now that I think of it, he’s going to be left all alone with little children and pregnant women who will know how he survived. How do you think they might react to that?

      • I found The Circle in a list of movies that were great but had very little exposure. Also on the list was “Moon,” about a man whose job is to be the solo person on the moon for a three year period while he watches over the automated mining machines.

      • I saw that one, too. It’s slow, but it’s good.

Leave a comment