Hello, dear readers! To those of you familiar with different schools of philosophy, you might be looking at the title of this post and thinking, huh? That’s an oxymoron if I ever saw one! But it’s an idea that’s been rumbling in and out of my head for about half a decade now, so hear me out. First, though, let’s dive into the individual concepts.
HUMANISM
Humanism is a branch of philosophy that was officially set off near the end of the 19th Century, though there are some who claim its roots go back to the Middle Ages. At the core, it emphasizes the value of humanity and praises human achievements. For example, when discussing a particularly cruel act, one might describe it as “inhumane.” An act of kindness, on the other hand, can be described as “humane.” This is because the root suggests something inherently good, or noble, in humanity. Humans are not monsters at the core, but something special, even praiseworthy. It is human compassion, ingenuity and a host of other unique characteristics that make humans good.
However, from the start, this philosophy has had problems, and it’s understandable why. Any philosophy which holds at its base a praise of the human person will, if left unchecked, inevitably lead toward arrogance, vanity and pride. And so it was with humanism. At a meeting held in the 1930s, a group of largely Unitarian preachers and scholars drafted the first “Humanist Manifesto,” setting the philosophy on the road toward intellectual arrogance. They envisioned empiricism replacing traditional belief, with human intellectual prowess being the defining characteristic of humanity. As a result, this view is known today as “Secular Humanism,” and it is almost completely atheistic. As a matter of fact, many atheists today – notably those arrogant militants who argue against religious belief, rather than the respectful ones who engage in open discourse – identify themselves as “secular humanists.”
THE SINNER’S DEPRAVITY
It’s not as bad as it sounds. Okay, it actually is as bad as it sounds, but let me explain. As atheists have become polarized as secular humanists, many Christians have run in the opposite direction and begun to adopt the exact opposite view. They’ve taken one of the chief bullet points of Calvinistic predestination and applied it more openly: Total Depravity. Total Depravity is the idea that all humans, upon having their nature marred by the Original Sin, have become turned wholly toward evil and are incapable of doing good. However, due to Christ’s sacrifice on the cross and the indwelling power of the Holy Spirit, good can now be done. It must be noted, though, that it is not the human person who does the good, but only the Holy Spirit within them. Humans are completely incapable of doing good; only God can do that.
Total Depravity not a widespread belief across all of Christianity, mind you, just as Secular Humanism is not a widespread belief across all of atheism, but it’s gaining some serious traction. Primarily, Total Depravity is popular among Fundamentalists and Evangelicals, who also just happen to be the loudest factions of the Christian Church. These Christians look at the human person and see only a broken, evil, corrupt sinner who can do no good on his own and needs God to rescue him.
CHRISTIAN HUMANISM: A BLENDING OF THE TWO
If I’m being honest, these both sound horrible. One leads to an unbridled arrogance and self-idolatry, while the other leads to misery and a self-loathing sense of helplessness. That doesn’t sound like a very happy world, if you ask me. But what if there’s a middle ground? What if there’s a more reasonable median between the two, somewhere where the sinner meets humanity?
On the one hand, I don’t think that intellectual prowess should be the defining characteristic of the human person. I used to be intellectually arrogant, and it was, quite frankly, miserable. So while I still strongly encourage intellectual development, I don’t believe it’s all there is to humanity. I believe we have compassion. I believe we have fraternity, and depth of emotion, and a sense of awe that brings joy to God. But we are not the crowning jewel of the universe. Too often, we fall into our selfish, self-oriented trap, and we act against those humane callings. We are imperfect and flawed, like diamonds with a big chip in the side or an impurity in the middle. And that’s why we need God. It’s only in the sacrifice of Christ that we can, by the guidance of God, become those perfect diamonds that he intended us to become.
But we are already shining reflections of our maker. We’re not mud-covered cockroaches incapable of any true achievement or good and noble action. If we were sinners and nothing else, then why would God continue to love us, to love us so much that he suffered a shameful death in an effort to save us? Why would God bother coming to us in the form of a savior if there was nothing redemptive in us worth saving? The answer must be that there is something within us, something humane, that indefinable characteristic that the humanists got lost in their attempts to find. And it’s only by the power of God that it can be uncovered.
This is what I mean by Christian Humanism: we are broken, amazing beings, capable of wondrous acts, but only when we let God put us back together.
Until next time, friends…